|
Rehabilitation
|
|
Rehabilitation
|
|
Written by Kim D. Christensen, D.C., C.C.S.P., D.A.C.R.B.
|
|
Sunday, 30 November 2003 00:00 |
|
As the population ages and becomes more sedentary, we will be seeing more of our patients affected by osteoporosis and its complications. Initially, there is a reduction in bone mass (osteopenia), which is considered a universal phenomenon of aging. However, when the condition progresses to osteoporosis, bone strength is compromised, and fractures develop with trivial (or no) trauma. These fractures may affect the extremities, the hip, and the spine. Physical activity and exercise have been shown to provide significant protection from osteoporosis1 and fractures.2 We have a duty to identify those patients who are at risk of fracture, and to provide exercise recommendations that will decrease that risk. We can tailor exercise programs to prevent the spinal complications of osteoporosis, such as kyphosis, vertebral wedging, and compression fractures.
Benefits of Exercise to Bone
As recalled from the principle known as Wolff’s Law, bone density and strength are a function of the magnitude and direction of the mechanical stresses that act on bone.3 Assuming the availability of necessary nutrients, stimulus to the osteoblasts results in a net gain in bone mass. Exercise is a form of repetitive loading that facilitates osteoblastic activity, thereby helping to maintain a positive balance between bone formation and bone resorption.4 Even a moderate amount of exercise that is recommended for general wellness (a minimum of thirty minutes on most days) is helpful in preventing osteoporosis.5
Exercise Types
Aerobic/endurance. Walking and swimming are two of the most commonly recommended forms of exercise for the elderly. While improved aerobic capacity is generally beneficial for most older patients, we mustn’t expect any skeletal improvement. Bone mineral density can be increased by walking, but only when it is done above the anaerobic threshold.6 It is unlikely that most older women, especially sedentary women, will be willing to walk at this intensity. As for swimming, there is no significant difference in bone mass between women participating in a regular swimming program and women who don’t swim.7 This is also true of a standard weightbearing, water-based exercise program (aquacise).8 Impact/weightbearing. In order to create sufficient stimulus to increase bone density, exercise needs to be weightbearing and have some impact. This can be as simple as step-training (ten minutes stepping up and down from an eight-inch high step).1 Use caution when recommending impact exercise to elderly patients. All exercises are more effective when done in an upright, weight-bearing position, since the entire body is in a closed-chain position during training. The stabilizing muscles, the co-contractors, and the antagonist muscles all learn to coordinate with the major movers during movements that are performed during closed chain exercising. This makes these types of exercises very valuable for the elderly—not just for increasing bone density, but also for preventing stumbles and falls. Resistance/strength. High-intensity resistance training has been found to be safe and quite effective in increasing strength and function in the elderly.9 Older patients make similar relative, but smaller absolute, strength gains when compared with younger adults. Weight training in a submaximal controlled, supervised situation can also preserve10 and even increase11 bone deposition. Strength training recommendations should be an integral part of chiropractic treatment for older and osteoporotic patients. Exercise tubing is an excellent tool for strength training of the elderly, since the risks of injury are minimized, and a spotter or expensive equipment is not needed.
Spinal Osteoporosis
Spinal X-rays often reveal osteopenia and osteoporosis. By the time changes are visible on X-ray, however, substantial bone loss has already occurred. The most common fractures due to osteoporosis are vertebral fractures, and yet less than a third u u of all vertebral fractures are clinically diagnosed.12 These skeletal of all vertebral fractures are clinically diagnosed.12 These skeletal changes can have a significant impact on posture and our ability to handle subluxation complexes. Specific rehabilitative exercises should be recommended to relieve the postural strain on the spine and to prevent further wedging and compression fractures. Avoiding exercise is the worst approach for an aging patient with osteoporosis. Back strengthening exercise constitutes a powerful intervention for reducing pain and increasing functional capacity. A warning: Some of the commonly used back exercises may contribute to increased symptoms. For patients with spinal osteoporosis, harmful activity places an anterior load on the vertebral bodies. Patient education must emphasize the dangers of lifting in flexion, and of, possibly, flexion exercises. In fact, one exercise study13 found an increase in new vertebral deformities when postmenopausal women performed flexion exercises (such as forward stretches and abdominal curls), while those who performed only spinal extension exercises had a significant reduction in the number of vertebral compressions.
Corrective Spinal Exercises
Spinal osteoporosis is often associated with poor postural support, specifically an increase in the thoracic kyphosis. This posture is secondary to many decades of flexed activities, and may be compounded by poor posture habits and tendencies to slump. One important factor in chiropractic care is to correct any loss of the normal upright alignment of the pelvis and spine. In addition to general strengthening and coordination exercises, all patients (especially the elderly) should be given corrective exercises that are specific for the postural imbalances they have developed.
Conclusion
A well-designed exercise program can improve posture, help to reduce bone loss, and prevent fractures, while also reducing symptoms. Exercises performed with the spine upright (standing or sitting) can specifically train and condition all the involved structures to work together smoothly. The end result is an effective rehab component for osteoporosis and aging patients who will make a rapid response to their chiropractic care.
Kim D. Christensen, DC, CCSP, CSCS, DACRB, founded the SportsMedicine & Rehab Clinics of Washington. He is a popular speaker, and participates as a team physician and consultant to high school and university athletic programs. Dr. Christensen is currently a postgraduate faculty member of numerous chiropractic colleges and is the president of the American Chiropractic Association (ACA) Rehab Council. He is a “Certified Strength and Conditioning Specialist,” certified by the National Strength and Conditioning Association. Dr. Christensen is the author of numerous publications and texts on musculoskeletal rehabilitation and nutrition. He can be reached at Chiropractic Rehabilitation Assoc., 18604 NW 64th Avenue, Ridgefield, WA 98642 or by email at
This e-mail address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it
.
References 1. Chien MY, Wu YT, Hsu AT, et al. Efficacy of a 24-week aerobic exercise program for osteopenic postmenopausal women. Calcif Tissue Int. 2000; 67:443-448. 2. Campbell AJ, Robertson MC, Gardner MM, et al. Randomised controlled trial of a general practice programme of home based exercise to prevent falls in elderly women. Br Med J. 1997; 315:1065-1069. 3. Davies GJ. A Compendium of Isokinetics in Clinical Usage. La Crosse, WI: S & S Publishers; 1984. 4. Pirnay FM. Bone mineral content and physical activity. Int J Sports Med. 1987; 8:331-335. 5. US Dept. of Health and Human Services. Physical Activity and Health: A Report of the Surgeon General. Atlanta: 1996. 6. Hatori M, Hasegawa A, Adachi H, et al. The effects of walking at the anaerobic threshold level on vertebral bone loss in postmenopausal women. Calcif Tissue Int. 1993; 52:411-414. 7. Orwoll ES, Ferar J, Oviatt SK, et al. The relationship of swimming exercise to bone mass in men and women. Arch Intern Med. 1989; 149:2197-2200. 8. Bravo G, Gauthier P, Roy PM, et al. A weight-bearing, water-based exercise program for osteopenic women: its impact on bone, functional fitness, and well-being. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1997; 78:1375-1380. 9. Fiatarone MA, Marks EC, Ryan ND, et al. High-intensity strength training in nonagenarians: effects on skeletal muscle. JAMA. 1990; 263:3029-3034. 10. Nelson ME, Fiatarone MA, Morganti CM, et al. Effects of high-intensity strength training on multiple risk factors for osteoporotic fractures. JAMA. 1994; 272:1909-1914. 11. Kerr D, Ackland T, Maslen B, et al. Resistance training over 2 years increases bone mass in calcium-replete postmenopausal women. J Bone Miner Res. 2001; 16:175-181. 12. Ross PD. Clinical consequences of vertebral fractures. Am J Med. 1997; 103:30S-43S. 13. Sinaki M, Mikkelsen BA. Postmenopausal spinal osteoporosis: flexion versus extension exercises. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1984; 65:593-596.
|
|
|
Rehabilitation
|
|
Written by Aadam Z. Quraishi, M. D.
|
|
Tuesday, 30 September 2003 00:00 |
|
Having a sport and rehab facility demands great expertise and close attention to detail in treatment protocols. In such settings, doctors often rely on objective findings of manual testing. Nonetheless, given the explosive level of technology available today, it is ludicrous for any doctor to rely strictly on “manual findings.” One of the greatest sources of objective findings available, to date, to all doctors but especially in rehab and sport facility settings is the use of diagnostic radiology. Indeed, the information that can be gathered using diagnostic radiology is very impressive.
What is the benefit of diagnostic radiology? After a thorough physical examination has been done and the need for the X-rays has been established, X-rays are sent to a specialized company which uses highly technical equipment and techniques to produce computerized enhancement of the radiographic plain films. One of the enhancements is called digital radiographic mensuration. The X-rays are scanned, and multiple landmarks are selected and stored in a location separate from the image. The numbered data, “landmarks,” are later used to reconstruct a variety of biomechanical relationships and measurements that are useful to the doctor and the patient. The diagnostic analyses, as well as biomechanical data, are extracted from these plain film radiographs and are then displayed on high-resolution monitors using comparative standards and technical procedures. These visuals of radiographic imaging are used objectively to analyze the biomechanical properties of the spine. At least fifty-nine biomechanical analyses for diagnostic purposes can be performed on such instruments. (See Table 1 to for a list of a few examples) Using highly technical equipment and techniques produces computerized enhancement of the radiographic plain films, that can then be used to perform at least fifty-nine biomechanical analyses for diagnostic purposes. Here are some Examples:
- Atlas Skull Line
- Stress Line
- Skull Line Baselines
- Thoracic Apex
- Baseline Atlas
- Stenosis
- Spinal Length
- Occiput Angle
- Ferguson’s Angle
- Sacrum Angle
- Penning’s Range of Motion
- Thoracic Kyphosis
- Jackson’s Angle
- Lumbar Instability
- Motion Segment Integrity
- Vertebral Offset
- George’s Line
- Atlas/Axis Angle
- Lumbar Gravity Line
- Vertebral Body Rotation
- Pelvic Rotation
- Lumbar Lordosis
- Cobb’s Angle
- Spondylolisthesis
It becomes medically necessary for a sports and rehab facility to fully assess the degree of injury and its effect on the patient’s health and future well-being. Reports obtained from digital analysis include impairment ratings, per the American Medical Association (AMA) Guides to the Evaluation of Permanent Impairment.
Defining “disability” American Medical Association Guides evaluate Medical Disability as well as Permanent Impairment. The term disability has historically referred to a broad category of individuals with diverse limitations and the ability to meet social or occupational demands. However, it is more accurate to refer to the specific activity or role the “disabled” individual is unable to perform. Several organizations are moving away from the term disability and, instead, are referring to specific activity limitations to encourage an emphasis on the specific activities the individual can perform and to identify how the environment can be altered to enable the individual to perform the activities associated with various social or occupational roles. Nonetheless, Guides to the Evaluation of Permanent Impairment defines disability as “an alteration of an individual’s capacity to meet personal, social, or occupational demands or statutory or regulatory requirements because of an impairment”. (American Medical Association. Guides to the Evaluation of Permanent Impairment. 5th ed. Chicago, Ill: American Medical Association; 1993)
What are the benefits to the patients? We live in an age when patients are particular about their health care needs and are demanding that their doctors under- u u stand not only the need for specific treatment, but also the findings of the objective testing. Using diagnostic radiology will bring the following benefits to the patient:
- Films read by a board certified radiologist
- Photographic reproduction of the patient’s film images, printed with complete measurements and displayed next to comparatively normal images, should be shown to the patient to explain the findings and insure patient retention. If the healthcare practitioner has expertise and is well acquainted with the individual’s activities and needs, then he or she must express an opinion about the presence or absence of the specific disability and how this will impact the patient’s daily activities.
Benefits to a Rehab Center Rehab centers are often made up of exercise physiologists, body trainers, physical therapists (Pt’s), Pt aids, Pt assistants, chiropractic practitioners and others. These sports and rehabilitation oriented practitioners, although very knowledgeable in assessing a patient’s diagnosis, can greatly benefit by the highly technical, yet diversified, information which is gathered from diagnostic radiology. Because every patient’s injury or disease is different and every patient responds differently to treatment, the information obtained from the digital analysis of radiographic images can prove or disprove the necessity for further treatment. This information is then used to customize the most effective treatment protocol for the patient’s injury and/or disease and may cut down on or eliminate unnecessary treatment. Biomechanical measurements are vital and are critical to the appropriate diagnosis analysis, treatment, and prognosis of the sports injury patient in a clinical environment. With accurate measurements, a fundamental base line can be determined and can further be explored for an accurate and reliable assessment of the patient’s condition and outcome potential. There is also a financial benefit, since the referring doctor gets reimbursed u u for the professional confirmatory component above and beyond the X-ray coding.
Below are a few samples of indications for diagnostic radiology.
- Sprains/ Strains
- Trauma
- Motor vehicular accidents
- Sports induced injuries
- Work related injuries
On a side note, and as a fundamental basis, DC’s often deal with the dynamics of the musculoskeletal system, whether or not the clinical neurological components exist. Simply stated, the science of chiropractic is founded on the premise that adequate nerve supply is of prime importance in regulating body function. Hence, radiographic measurements obtained from diagnostic radiology and utilized in a rehab facility can:
- Increase Personal Injury referral
- Enhance reputation
- Increase patient compliance
- Support insurance claims with scientific medical proof
- Provide attorneys with professional documentation
- Increase collections
How to implement diagnostic radiology
- Determine need for X-rays.
- Take flexion/extension study of cervical or lumbar area (or both, if needed).
- Referring doctor reads films and gives brief impression to patient.
- Films are sent for digitization and for impression by Board Certified Radiologist (licensed in the state where patient is being treated).
- Analysis is done and returned to referring doctor.
- Treatment protocol is established and information is given over to patient.
- Service is billed for consultation to proper carrier.
In conclusion, other procedures (i.e., NCV, SSEP, MRI, US, Electromyography, etc.) should always be correlated to clinical history, physical examination and radiographic findings for a more comprehensive and complete picture of the patient’s status. Digitized radiology has shown reliability, accuracy and benefit paralleled to this time in history with respect to spinal radiographic analysis. In determining need for treatment, type of treatment to be administered, and/or monitoring of changes of treatment resulting from re-injury, for prognosis, digitized analysis for radiology is an effective outcome assessment device and methodology for chiropractic services in a rehab facility.
Aadam Quraishi, MD, was a clinical instructor at New York University Medical Center. He is board certified in radi-ology and has additional fellowship trained qualifications. He has seventeen years of medical practice experience. Dr. Quraishi specializes in Vascular and Interventional Radiology MRI (Neuro and Musculosketal), MRA Mammography, Breast Localization, Nuclear Medicine CT and Ultrasound. Dr. Quraishi has board certification in Diagnostic Radiology, and can be contacted at
This e-mail address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it
. For more information and/or sample reports, go to www.aboutpdi.com.
|
|
Rehabilitation
|
|
Written by Daniel Dahan, D.C.
|
|
Tuesday, 30 September 2003 00:00 |
|
About 83 million people in the U.S. (42% of the adult population) used at least one alternative therapy in 1997. Usage among those 35-40-years-old is even higher, at 50%. The estimated number of visits in 1997 to providers of “unconventional therapy” (629 million) was greater than the number of visits to all primary care medical doctors nationwide (386 million). Americans spent $21 billion out-of-pocket on visits to alternative practitioners in 1997 (an increase of 45% over 1990’s total). This does not include money spent on retail products, such as herbal products ($5.1 billion), books, classes and equipment ($4.7 billion). By comparison, out-of-pocket expenditures for physician visits were $29.3 billion and for hospitalizations were $9.1 billion. We have to ask why 42.1 percent of U.S. citizens surveyed used at least one of sixteen alternative medicine practitioners, increasing from 427 million in 1990 to 629 million in 1997, exceeding the total visits to primary care physicians. What is of greater interest is that these statistics have continued to increase—by 3.6% between the years of 2001 and 2002. None of these statistics, however, come close to the billions Americans spend on exercise and fitness. Over 50% of the American population is overweight and the number is growing. What does this all mean for the primary healthcare provider such as a DC? The DC, basically, has to be prepared to diversify his/her services and, most of all, create a center where exercise and rehabilitative therapy are key components. DC’s have always looked for ways to increase their income, often by learning new techniques or buying some expensive piece of diagnostic equipment. While these can be valuable investments, they are not as effective as knowing how to establish, manage and/or promote a rehab center. Following are the basic protocols, which have to be put into place to establish a rehab center. (See Table 1).
Table 1. basic protocols to establish a rehab center 1. Necessary Education: Proficiency in sports medicine. 2. Professional Staff: Exercise physiologist, physical therapist, physical therapist aide, and/or assistant, fitness trainer, massage therapist. 3. Equipment: Minimum equipment necessary is a full body station, treadmill, enlarged physical therapy table, various weights, stationary bike, exercise mats. Miscellaneous: towels, theraband, cold packs, etc. Approximate initial cost of total equipment, between $10,000 to $15,000 Certification is a must for all professionals Ideal size room, 800 sq. ft.
Table 2. Most Common Scenario Used in Rehab Facility 1. Doctor initial exam 2. X-Ray/ancillary services 3. Treatment protocol established and started 4. Diagnostic testing 5. Rehab with PT (4 weeks) 6. Re-exam to update or change diagnosis 7. Rehab with PT (4-8 weeks) 8. Discharge
Table 3. 10 Steps to Opening Date 1. Plan out (draw out) rehab room space 2. Interview and hire professional staff 3. Design marketing plan (newspaper ads, coupons, flyers, etc.) and allocate marketing budget ($3,000 to $5,000) 4. Purchase equipment (ask accountant if leasing is better option) 5. Understand billing codes and implement rehab form (See Table 4) 6. Create appointment script for front desk 7. Train office staff 8. Send letter to all local businesses 9. Send announcement letter to all active patients 10.Have grand opening day (balloons, prizes, music…)
Expected Reimbursement in Rehab Exercise Facility The above scenario is by far the most practical flow that will allow the highest reimbursement. It is important to take into consideration that insurance companies do not approve “medical maintenance care”. Insurance companies will pay for treatment, but not for exercise physiology and/or rehabilitative medicine when used to enhance a patient’s stamina or endurance. Insurance companies are interested in treating patients and rehabilitating them, given serious practice medical diagnosis.
Table 4. reimbursements for rehab patients Total reimbursements for rehab patients vary between $4,500 to $6,500. CPT codes most often used are as follows: 97535 Activities of Daily Living 97112 Neuromuscular Re-education of movement, balance, coordination, kinesthetic sense, Posture, and/or proprioception for sitting and/or standing activities 97110 Therapeutic procedure, each 15 min., therapeutic exercise to develop strength and endurance, range of motion and flexibility. 97530 Therapeutic activities, direct patient contact by the provider, each 15 min. 97799 Unlisted Physical Medicine/Rehab service or procedure 97139 Unlisted Therapeutic Procedure (specify) 97150 Therapeutic procedure(s), group (2 or more individuals) 97750 Physical Performance Test or Measurement w/report 97504 Orthotic(s) fitting and training, upper and lower extremities, each 15 min. 97520 Prosthetic Training, each 15 min. 97140 Manual Therapy techniques (Manual Traction), each 15 min. 97124 Massage Therapy, including effleurage, petrissage, and/or tapotement 97113 Aquatic Therapy with therapeutic exercises 97537 Community/Work Reintegration Training, direct contact, each 15 min. 97542 Wheelchair Management/Propulsion Training, each 15 min. 97703 Checkout for orthotic/prosthetic use established patient, each 15 min. 97545 Work Hardening/Conditioning (initial 2 hrs.) 97546 Each additional hour (list separately in addition to code for primary procedure). (Use 97546 in conjunction with code 97545) 97116 Gait Training 95833 Total Evaluation of Body w/o Hands 95834 Total Evaluation of body w/ Hands 95851 ROM Measure w/Report, each extremity 95852 Hand w/ or w/o Comparison to Normal Side
Objective Testing That Can Be Used to Support Medical Necessity and Enhance Medical Records 1. X-Rays 2. Digitized Radiographic Mensurations 3. MRI 4. Neurological Diagnostic Testing
General Discussion Overall, a rehabilitation center is a great addition for any practitioner. Using diversified healthcare, the doctor has the ability to promote the best treatment protocol available. The core problem in healthcare today lies in the fact that there are currently not significant entities that can provide quality care at sufficiently low prices on a large enough scale to service the overwhelming needs of the population. By creating a rehab sport center, a clinic will provide a viable solution to the healthcare crisis, by integrating the skills of the chiropractor and various other healthcare practitioners, such as exercise physiologist, physical therapist, etc., leading to the development of a profitable venture. This, by all means, is the wave of the future.
Dr. Daniel H. Dahan owned and operated one of the most successful clinics in Southern California. As previous chairman of the West Coast Medical Advisory Board and writer/editor for the Sun’s Weekly Health Column, Dr. Dahan, the President of Practice Perfect, developed a successful management and consulting health care system for doctors throughout the United States. His seminars are rated among the best and most proliferate lectures in the country. Dr. Dahan has taught over 4700 doctors and integrated 800+ offices in 45 states. He can be contacted at
This e-mail address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it
. For more information, go to www.dahan.com.
|
|
|
Rehabilitation
|
|
Written by Kim D. Christensen, D.C., C.C.S.P., D.A.C.R.B.
|
|
Wednesday, 30 July 2003 00:00 |
|
A large percentage of patients don’t perform the home-based rehabilitative exercises that are recommended to them.1 Even though you spend precious time deciding which exercises will be helpful and explaining them to the patient, your experience has probably been the same as most chiropractors: Too many patients just can’t seem to do their exercises. And yet, you know that if they would just do the exercises, they would get better faster. Patient cooperation and satisfaction with at-home exercise programs are important for successful outcomes.2

In my opinion, each patient has several barriers or “hurdles” to get over in order to reach the goal of exercising. The more hurdles we can lower or even eliminate, the more likely it is that the exercises will get done. Here are some ways to lower the hurdles and help your patients get to the “‘finish line.”
Small Beginnings
Lower the first big hurdle by recommending only one (or, at most, two) exercise(s) initially. This minimizes the start-up effort and decreases the amount of time required. Once a patient has been doing one or two exercises regularly for a couple of weeks, additional or more complex exercises can be more easily implemented.
Consistency for Success
Consistency helps to ensure success in many areas. When a new habit needs to be learned, frequent and regular repetition helps.3 Trying to schedule exercises into a busy schedule is difficult, especially when your patient has to decide which days to exercise and which days to rest. Since rehabilitative exercises do not tear down muscles, daily exercising is safe, and the scheduling hurdle can be eliminated. Instruct your patients to “do the exercises every day.”
Why, What, and How
Make sure your patient knows why the exercise needs to be done, and what benefits to expect. Motivation improves compliance with exercise.4 Motivation is much better when a purpose is understood and a mutual goal has been established. Explain that doing the exercise will help your patient better perform the activities he or she enjoys.
Simple Is Best
Keep instructions to patients clear and simple. This is particularly important when discussing the numbers of repetitions and “sets” (groups of repetitions). Many doctors recommend six repetitions of the exercise, followed by a brief (up to one minute) rest, done three times. This “three sets of six” concept is quick to perform and easy to understand. Recent research has shown that only one set of ten-to-twelve repetitions can be just as effective. This is particularly true when patients are just starting to exercise, and especially when they are exercising daily. Use either approach, but keep the instructions clear.
Using the “Whenever” Approach
Any time of day is the right time to exercise—what’s most important is getting the exercises done. Even though some professionals feel that athletic activities are somewhat safer in the afternoon (when muscles and joints are warmer), encourage your patients to exercise whenever it works for their schedule (and once a day is plenty).
Utilize Allies
A spouse or family member should accompany the patient when exercises are taught, so they can help ensure correct and regular performance of the exercise. A second person who wants your patient to get better can be a tremendous ally,1 one who will provide encouragement and reminders.
Focus on Function
Focus your patients on function by keeping them off the floor. Exercising in a weight-bearing position is actually easier for patients. In addition to being more focused and practical, upright exercising trains and strengthens the spine to perform better in everyday activities. Patients like the idea of doing an exercise that clearly prepares them for better function during normal activities of daily life.
Provide Demonstration
Demonstrate, then watch and correct your patients’ performance of the exercise. When patients need an exercise, they usually can’t do the exercise correctly. Diagrams, pictures, even videos can’t ensure that patients will be able to figure out the suggested exercise. When you spend the time to show them the exercise, and then you guide them through it, they realize that you believe this is an important part of their treatment. Patients are then much more likely to do the exercise.1
Keep it Easy
Well-designed, easy-to-use home rehab equipment helps to ensure compliance.5 Home equipment should be easy to figure out and set up, and should help guide your patients through the necessary exercises.
Monitor and Praise
As an integral part of their rehab while under your care, all patients must record their exercising in some form of exercise log. This allows them to “give themselves a pat on the back” each time they do the exercise. And remind them to bring the exercise log with them to every adjustment, so you can see how the exercises are going. Make sure to give them praise and recognition for the exercises they perform.
Rehab Review
At least once a week, have the patient perform their exercise in front of you. This allows you to confirm that it’s being done properly, and you can correct any faults that creep in. A regular review also reinforces, in the patient’s mind, the importance of the exercising and encourages them to continue.
Aim for a Rapid Response
There is nothing more motivating than the feeling that the most important exercises are being done. Make sure that the exercise(s) you are recommending will produce a rapid response, so the patient starts to feel the benefits of the exercising immediately. Don’t give all patients the same six exercises; instead, try to start the patient on the most important exercise for his or her condition.1
Gradual Development
If you implement these rehab tips, your patients will be more likely to do their exercises faithfully. Once they have established the habit of doing one or two exercises, you can use the rehab review to add other exercises. With this method, a patient can gradually develop a good general fitness and spinal health exercise program while under your care.
Word will soon get around your community that you care enough about your patients to help them establish a regular spinal health and exercise program. This will build your practice, and also improve the reputation of chiropractic for years to come.
Kim D. Christensen, DC, CCSP, CSCS, DACRB, founded the SportsMedicine & Rehab Clinics of Washington. He is a popular speaker, and participates as a team physician and consultant to high school and university athletic programs. Dr. Christensen is currently a postgraduate faculty member of numerous chiropractic colleges and is the president of the American Chiropractic Association (ACA) Rehab Council. He is a “Certified Strength and Conditioning Specialist,” certified by the National Strength and Conditioning Association. Dr. Christensen is the author of numerous publications and texts on musculoskeletal rehabilitation and nutrition. He can be reached at Chiropractic Rehabilitation Consulting, 18604 NW 64th Avenue, Ridgefield, WA 98642 or by email at
This e-mail address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it
.
References
- Kamiya A, Ohsawa I, et al. A clinical survey on the compliance of exercise therapy for diabetic outpatients. Diabetes Res Clin Pract 1995; 27(2):141-145.
- Chen CY, Neufeld PS, et al. Factors influencing compliance with home exercise programs among patients with upper-extremity impairment. Am J Occup Ther 1999; 53(2):171-180.
- Rejeski WJ, Brawley LR, et al. Compliance to exercise therapy in older participants with knee osteoarthritis: implications for treating disability. Med Sci Sports Exerc 1997; 29(8):977-985.
- Friedrich M, Gittler G, et al. Combined exercise and motivation program: effect on the compliance and level of disability of patients with chronic low back pain: a randomized controlled trial. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 1998; 79(5):475-487.
- Stenstrom CH, Arge B, Sundbom A. Home exercise and compliance in inflammatory rheumatic diseases: a prospective clinical trial. J Rheumatol 1997; 24(3):4700-476.
|
|
Rehabilitation
|
|
Written by Kim D. Christensen, D.C., C.C.S.P., D.A.C.R.B.
|
|
Friday, 30 May 2003 00:00 |
|
Patients receiving rehab care for various chronic or acute neck problems often come across advertisements promoting special “neck support” pillows. Cervical support pillows are recommended by many chiropractors, physiotherapists, and even surgeons. In a 1998 comparison study of three types of bed pillows, the authors write, “From a patient’s perspective, neck support is an important part of a comprehensive physiotherapy program.”1 Most bedding stores and sleep shops have at least one special pillow (and often there are several) for people with neck pain. While many doctors of chiropractic have recommended cervical support pillows for years, the scientific evidence for benefit has been skimpy, at best.1-5 Empirical and anecdotal reports from patients who report “improved sleep” and “decreased pain” have often been all that is available.
Scientific Studies
Let’s review three scientific studies2-4 which have attempted to address some of the questions regarding cervical pillows. Although each of these three took different investigative approaches and evaluated different pillows—which means that the findings are not directly comparable, and no definitive conclusions can be made—the results are still worth consideration, since they give us some guidance in selecting a support pillow for our patients. Two-pillow comparison study. In a study2 performed at the Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Drs. Lavin, Pappagallo, and Kuhlemeier recruited forty-six subjects with chronic neck pain and cervicogenic headaches. The investigation compared the subjects’ daily pain levels, sleep quality, and medication consumption during one week on their own pillows, followed by two weeks each on two special neck support pillows. One of the pillows was a “cervical roll” style and the other was a “water-based cervical pillow.” A statistically significant improvement in all scores was recorded when using the water pillow. Most subjects preferred the water pillow to their own pillow, and many had a very difficult time sleeping on the roll pillow. In fact, the researchers reported that some of the patients had to discontinue the two-week trial of the roll pillow due to significant discomfort. The investigators felt that the higher satisfaction ratings of the water pillow were due to its ability to conform better to the position and shape of the subjects’ head and neck during various sleep positions. They believed that the roll pillow was not well tolerated due to its tendency to exaggerate the extension of the neck when supine (since there was no support underneath the head). Single-style study. A small feasibility study3 at Canadian Memorial Chiropractic College seemed to find very different results. After recording two weeks of baseline pain ratings in thirty subjects with chronic neck pain, the researchers supplied a roll-type cervical pillow (a soft cylinder shape). Of those who persevered in using the pillow for four weeks (many subjects found the pillow to be very uncomfortable initially), most reported decreases in neck pain. However, three subjects described increased neck pain during use of the pillow, and two women dropped out of the trial, saying they were unable to tolerate the discomfort they experienced while using the cylindrical pillow. Since the data collected do not reflect these “pillow failures,” and since there was no placebo or comparison with other pillows, this study’s conclusions should be considered overly optimistic. This demonstrates the difficulty in designing a scientifically valid and practically useful scientific investigation. Six-pillow comparison study. At Lund University Hospital in Sweden, researchers4 studied the responses of fifty-five subjects to three nights on each of six different pillows. However, none of the six pillows included their own pillows, and none was the same as the two types studied in the previous experiments. Since no “roll-type” pillows were included, we are left without a practical comparison to the other studies. The subjects in this experiment rated the six pillows for comfort, but were also asked about pain reduction and sleep improvement. The six pillows varied in their designs, materials, and construction. One pillow stood out from the rest as the most comfortable, and also the most likely to decrease chronic pain. Rated the “best” by both men and women, this pillow was made of soft polyurethane with two firm supports along the edges—one side high and the other side lower. This pillow supplied an easily tolerated support for the neck, while the two different sides provided a choice of heights. The pillow that rated the lowest was the one which most closely resembled a roll pillow. The investigators concluded that the optimal neck pillow to reduce neck pain and improve night rest was a soft, not-too-high pillow with support for the cervical lordosis from a choice of firmer cores. Since the participants used each pillow for only three nights, and only comfort ratings were evaluated, no conclusions can be drawn from this study regarding the long-term effect of these pillows on pain or sleep patterns.
The Search for Healthy Sleep.
When patients report chronic neck pain, cervicobrachialgia, and/or cervico-genic headaches, or when a patient has been instructed to perform rehabilitative cervical exercises, a cervical support pillow should be considered. This is especially true when the pain is described as being worse in the morning and improving during the day. If sleep disturbances are part of the history, or accompanied by a history of injury to the neck, a comfortable, yet supportive pillow should be a part of the chiropractic treatment recommendations. The right pillow will vary depending on the size of the person and on the amount of neck support that can be tolerated. Roll-type cervical pillows are initially uncomfortable, and may worsen some patients. A pillow which supplies a choice of sides is more likely to be helpful to a broader range of patients. It is also important to re-evaluate your patients’ pillows, to ensure that proper cervical support continues over time. Recommending the use of a good cervical support pillow (and supplying one that has a good track record) can be one of the most useful adjunctive procedures to rehabilitative treatment of neck pain. Patients appreciate the doctor who goes beyond the office setting to give advice regarding supportive home activities, and even specific sleep recommendations. TAC
Kim D. Christensen, DC, CCSP, CSCS, DACRB, founded the SportsMedicine & Rehab Clinics of Washington. He is a popular speaker, and participates as a team physician and consultant to high school and university athletic programs. Dr. Christensen is currently a postgraduate faculty member of numerous chiropractic colleges and is the president of the American Chiropractic Association (ACA) Rehab Council. He is a “Certified Strength and Conditioning Specialist,” certified by the National Strength and Conditioning Association. Dr. Christensen is the author of numerous publications and texts on musculoskeletal rehabilitation and nutrition. He can be reached at Chiropractic Rehabilitation Assoc., 18604 NW 64th Avenue, Ridgefield, WA 98642 or by email at
This e-mail address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Page 20 of 21 |
|
|
|