|
Rehabilitation
|
|
Rehabilitation
|
|
Written by Dr. Kirk A. Lee, D.C., C.C.S.P.
|
|
Sunday, 27 July 2008 11:33 |
|
Shin splints is one of the more common problems that can occur in active patients, especially during the spring and summer months. It is important to maintain an awareness of this frequent complaint and know the signs to look for during diagnosis. Help keep your active patients in step with their lifestyles!
Symptoms
The pain associated with shin splints can be in multiple locations or an individual area. The most common areas are along the inside or medial side of the tibia (shin bone) to just above your ankle bone (medial malleolus) and on the outside or lateral side of the tibia (shin bone). A third location can be behind the outside or lateral ankle bone (lateral maleolus); this pain can begin behind the ankle and radiate underneath the ankle bone and continue down into the foot.
Causative Factors
One of the causes for the pain associated with shin splints is excessive pronation, or rolling in of the foot. This causes a reduction in the arch of the foot so that the foot flattens. In turn, the flattening of the arch creates excessive pulling and stress on the muscles and ligaments of the lower leg, which all insert into the top or bottom of the foot.
Other causes can be from improper shoes, both from lack of adequate arch support, and wrong shoe styles based on your foot structure. Additionally, muscle imbalances may have occurred from poor biomechanics during running or the gait cycle. Other gait-related issues can be from foot placement during the gait cycle and cause additional stresses to be placed on the lower leg musculature.
Sudden changes in training, like increasing mileage too soon or excessive running on an incline or decline, place more stresses on the lower leg musculature.
Treatment
One of the first courses of action is assessing the gait cycle to correct poor technique and to help recognize postural deficits that may have resulted. This allows more precise determination in rehabilitation procedures and other care options.
Take care to recommend the proper shoe to match your patient’s foot type or structure. Additionally, consider the possibility of custom-made Spinal Pelvic Stabilizers, also known as orthotics, for additional correction or support of excessive movement within the foot.
Rehabilitation will include appropriate stretches based on the muscle groups that are involved. When needed, strengthening will be recommended through functional drills or specific exercises using rehab bands or other rehabilitation devices.
If postural or structural imbalances are noted, a recommendation for a chiropractic spinal examination may be recommended to correct these imbalances. This will be done through safe chiropractic manipulative therapies using either manual means or specific instrumentation based on what will serve your patient’s present condition.
A 1980 graduate of Palmer College of Chiropractic, Dr. Kirk Lee is a member of the Palmer College of Chiropractic Post Graduate Faculty and Parker College of Chiropractic Post Graduate Faculty. He has lectured nationwide on sports injuries and the adolescent athlete, and currently practices in Albion, Michigan. Dr. Lee can be reached at
This e-mail address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it
.
References
1. Gatorade Sports Science Institute, Sports Science Exchange. Should you Stretch before exercise? Vol. 20, Number 1. 2007.
2. McGill, S, PhD. Ultimate Back Fitness and Performance. Wabuno Publishers. 2004.
3. Alter, M. Understanding Flexibility. Sport Stretch. Human Kinetics. 2000.
4. Anderson, B. Stretching. Shelter Publications. 2000.
|
|
|
Rehabilitation
|
|
Written by Dr. Mark R. Payne, D.C.
|
|
Friday, 27 June 2008 14:14 |
|
Last month, I discussed the Dakota Traction™, a simple home device for use in restoring the cervical lordosis. This time, I want to discuss a simple extension traction procedure for use within the professional office. In-Office traction has two key advantages over home traction: It helps insure some degree of compliance, especially during the early phase of care, and provides a safe supervised environment to help patients become accustomed to a regimen of extension traction care and to become proficient at using the equipment. Let’s take a look at a simple and affordable method you can use in your office, known as Compression-CounterStressing Traction (AKA, the "Stynchula Method").
The method actually requires two simple devices. First, the patient is placed in a seated position, facing the wall, with a weighted traction harness placed so as to pull or "compress" the head downward and back into full extension (See Fig.1). A second device (the "counterstressing strap") is placed behind the patient’s neck and attached to the wall in front of the patient. The purpose of the counterstresssing strap is to pull forward into the lordosis while the head is being extended backward. The combined result is a focused stretching of the anterior soft tissues in such a way as to reinforce the cervical lordosis. This type of traction is often much more comfortable than many other methods because the counterstressing strap provides support to posterior facet joints which are often inflamed in the typical chiropractic patient.

Compression-Counterstressing traction has been around for well over a decade now and was recently evaluated in a non-randomized clinical control trial. Thirty patients were treated over approximately fourteen weeks using the traction method in combination with typical chiropractic manipulative therapy.1 Patients in the treatment group were matched against a control group receiving no treatment. The results were encouraging. Patients in the treatment group saw improvements on the order of 13.6 degrees in their overall cervical lordosis (Jackson’s Angle) and an improvement in forward head posture of approximately 11 mm, compared to none in the controls. On a more positive note, twenty one of the original thirty in the treatment group were maintaining their corrections over a year later! These results are well in line with studies on other variations of extension traction applications and are very close to what I have personally witnessed in my own office as well.
Patient Safety
Essentially, every therapeutic procedure carries some degree of risk and extension traction is no different. As a general rule of thumb, you should not consider applying cervical extension traction to any patient for whom spinal adjustment/manipulation of the neck would be contraindicated. Conditions which may contribute to increased risk of complications might include: high blood pressure, hypertension, diabetes, atherosclerosis, arteriosclerosis, posterior osteophytic spurring, disc protrusion/prolapse, smoking, oral contraceptives, prolonged use of corticosteroids, Down’s Syndrome, spinal stenosis, or any history of cerebrovascular disease. Doctors should also be very wary of patients presenting with any unexplained loss of consciousness, disturbances of vision or equilibrium, transient ischemic attacks, spinal fracture/ instability/malignancy or disease, hemophilia or other blood clotting disorders, including anticoagulant therapy. This list isn’t necessarily complete, but should provide interested doctors with a good idea of the types of conditions which may represent unacceptable risk factors. In addition to a complete history, all patients should undergo a physical screening procedure as well. A complete description of our patient screening procedure is available free upon request and I will discuss patient safety at more length in a future article.
Treatment
Assuming there are no contraindications, adult patients generally start with three pounds of weight on the traction harness. The head is allowed to relax into full extension and the counterstressing strap is then angled and tensioned so as to properly reinforce the cervical lordosis and maximize patient comfort. Treatment time is generally increased about a minute or so each visit, according to patient tolerance. Although the optimum time for soft tissue stretch is probably in the 20-30 minute range, such longer sessions are best done by the patient at home. I prefer to keep In-Office traction sessions to a more manageable 10-12 minute range and then increase the weight slightly once the target time has been reached. It’s not unusual for patients to work up to five or six lbs of weight after only a few weeks of traction in the office.
In my opinion, Compression-CounterStressing Traction should be your number one choice for In-Office traction for several reasons. First, the method is easily learned by doctors and staff and will only cost about a hundred bucks per station to set up. Secondly, the method is well tolerated by most patients and so simple your patients will quickly learn how to transition themselves in and out of traction with minimal assistance. Third, it’s very space efficient. Traction stations can be placed about every 32 inches or so along the wall of your rehab area, so one small wall space can easily accommodate a number of patients at once. Finally, offering In-Office traction will help boost your bottom line while helping your patients achieve real and meaningful structural change. I routinely have clients call to say their new traction equipment paid for itself on day one.
For a more complete discussion of potential risk factors, patient screening procedures, and treatment protocols, call Dr. Payne at 1-334-448-1210 for his free report on Patient Safety. Dr. Mark R. Payne is the president of Matlin Mfg., a manufacturer and distributor of postural rehab products since 1988. To download a full and unabridged version of this article, link to www.MatlinMfg.com.
Reference
1. Harrison DE. Harrison DD, et al. "Increasing the Cervical Lordosis with Chiropractic Biophysics Seated Combined Extension-Compression and Transverse Load Cervical Traction with Cervical Manipulation: Nonrandomized Clinical Control Trial". J. Manipulative Physiol Ther. 2003, Volume 28, Issue 3, Pages 214-214.
|
|
Rehabilitation
|
|
Written by Dr. Kirk A. Lee, D.C., C.C.S.P.
|
|
Wednesday, 28 May 2008 10:29 |
|
Stretching has been part of sports for a long time. First, it was a mainstay before any exercise activity and was usually referred to as "calisthenics," involving activities like jumping jacks, push-ups, knee bends, or sit-ups, to name a few. Then a new trend developed, "stretching after activity." This actually made sense to give the athlete the opportunity to stretch the tightened muscles and joints after activity to increase ranges of motion and reduce soreness.
With the advances of technology and research, numerous studies have been conducted on the pros and cons of stretching in injury reduction and performance enhancing. Many of these studies have found that there is no actual benefit in stretching prior to activities and, in some cases, it actually inhibits performance when an athlete overstretches a muscle or muscle group.
However, some factors need to be considered when we look at these studies. Most were performed on athletes who were already conditioned, like experienced runners, for example. A typical runner would perform a short stretch of the lower leg muscles and begin the run—starting at a slower pace to stimulate circulation, loosen joints and muscles. Then, gradually increasing the pace to his or her training level, the runner would finally end the work out with a cool down period and more thorough stretching designed to loosen tight muscles and joints. As we look at the above scenario, it seems the purpose is not to stretch muscles, but the joints. From a physiology standpoint, if we were to tear muscle tissue, we know the end result would be swelling, tissue discoloration and possible palpable mass (hematoma). The ultimate tightness that may or may not develop within the muscle comes from the repetitive concentric and eccentric contraction of the muscle.
Perhaps the real answer to reducing injury is through the generalized easy jog or "warm-up" to loosen up the structural joints: ankle, knee, hip, spine, shoulder, elbow and wrist. Consider the anatomy of these joints; most are enclosed by a capsular ligament which—like any other ligamentous tissue—when overstretched from a specific trauma or repetitive trauma, results in a pain syndrome.
Anatomy-wise, we know muscle tissue—due to its high blood and nerve supply—heals quicker than tendonous and ligamentous tissue. The secret to stretching could be stimulating a slight stretch on the capsules, not major muscle groups. A good example of this is the patient who enters our office with a "frozen shoulder." When we muscle test the patient’s rotator cuff muscles, it may produce pain on specific movements, but we feel resistance and a positive end point. Usually these are negative on MRI of any tearing of muscle tissue, so what is creating his pain and restricted ranges of motion?
Through our consultation, we might identify a precursory movement, like reaching high into a cabinet for something or reaching up to hang a picture on a wall. If the involved joint had not been loosened or been placed in sequences leading up to the movement, it did not take the muscle past its range of motion but actually stressed the capsular ligament.
The majority of our practices are not made up of the conditioned athlete, but of the factory worker, office personnel, and farmer. These patients do repetitive activities; when they overexert a joint, it results in a pain cycle causing them to call their friendly chiropractor.
So, do we instruct our patients to perform certain stretches to avoid injury? The answer varies from patient to patient. If the patient participates in an activity that requires maximum flexibility, like diving, swimming, or gymnastics, we must ensure that they have full ranges of motion in all joints.1 If our patient is an athlete, we may want to recommend certain stretches based on previous injury or measurable restrictions in a specific range of motion, with an emphasis on proper warm-up and stretching afterwards. For our non-athletic patients, we should tailor stretches to their activities of daily living.
A primary consideration for all our patients, in preventing injuries and reaggravation, is to maintain a healthy level of cardiovascular conditioning. Simple activities, such as walking, go a long way in developing a good level of fitness. As Stuart McGill points out, "Only biomechanical overload can cause tissue damage."2
Some practical tips for helping patients avoid injury:
• If stretches are recommended, have the patient warm-up muscles and joints with a light aerobic activity (walking, jogging, etc.)
• Stretches should be done slowly, holding the stretch for fifteen to thirty seconds and repeated up to two to three times per muscle group
• Tailor stretches to be job or sport specific
• Above all else, make sure the stretch is being performed in a proper movement pattern to not compromise other tissues and joints
A 1980 graduate of Palmer College of Chiropractic, Dr. Kirk Lee is a member of the Palmer College of Chiropractic Post Graduate Faculty and Parker College of Chiropractic Post Graduate Faculty. He has lectured nationwide on sports injuries and the adolescent athlete, and currently practices in Albion, Michigan.
References
1. Gatorade Sports Science Institute, Sports Science Exchange. Should you Stretch before exercise? Vol. 20, Number 1. 2007.
2. McGill, S, PhD. Ultimate Back Fitness and Performance. Wabuno Publishers. 2004.
3. Alter, M. Understanding Flexibility. Sport Stretch. Human Kinetics. 2000.
4. Anderson, B. Stretching. Shelter Publications. 2000.
|
|
|
Rehabilitation
|
|
Written by Dr. Mark R. Payne, D.C.
|
|
Wednesday, 28 May 2008 10:18 |
|
In our March article, we discussed how the physical properties of tight, contracted, paraspinal tissues create resistance to the corrective forces of your adjustments. Last month, I showed you a great example of how one case of scoliosis was successfully managed using simple blocking techniques to introduce sustained stretching forces into the spine. In this article, I want to discuss one effective way to apply the same principles of sustained stretching to correct the cervical lordosis.
Most of your adult patients will present with spines held in sub-optimal postures for many years. The longer your patient has labored under the demands of abnormal posture, the more likely he or she is to have adaptation and contraction of the surrounding soft tissues. Once this occurs, the visco-plastic characteristics of the contracted tissues will sabotage your attempts to adjust the spine back toward normal structure. Shortened and contracted soft tissues simply won’t yield to the rapid on-off forces of traditional adjustments. They require time to stretch. To correct these patients, you need a different tool set.
In a previous article, I mentioned that corrective forces should generally be applied for twenty to thirty minutes daily for effective stretch to occur. Two thoughts should leap immediately to your mind here. First, you definitely don’t want to do this by hand and, secondly, it isn’t practical for patients to traction every single day in your office for thirty minutes. If you are really serious about having your patients perform extension traction on a daily basis, much of the work will need to be done at home. There are a number of devices on the market which attempt to restore the lordosis, many of which will work very well. In a shameless act of self promotion, I want to discuss a simple but very effective home traction device manufactured by my company. It’s called the Dakota Traction™ (See Fig.1). Please consider it as just one item for your bag of tricks. Here’s how it works.
One method shown effective in restoring the cervical lordosis is called "extension-compression" traction. So named because the head is extended backward and compressed downward (caudally), the method actually only produces compression loading on the posterior motor units. The anterior motor unit is actually unloaded to create tensile stretch in the anterior soft tissues (See Fig.2). Traction force is provided by a simple, padded elastic band which passes over the forehead. The amount of force can be easily adjusted as needed for patient comfort. In my experience, extension-compression methods are generally well tolerated by about 75 percent of patients. Those patients who find the method uncomfortable may require an alternative method to achieve correction.
Patients generally begin with only a few ounces of force for two or three minutes daily. Patients should gradually increase daily treatment times, as able, until they can comfortably handle twenty to thirty minutes daily. Only after the patient has reached the target time is the traction force increased slightly by tightening the elastic cord. Remember, our goal here is to simply apply gentle stretching force for sufficient time to allow viscous and plastic deformation to take place. I am aware some authorities promote the use of much higher amounts of force to vigorously stretch the neck into lordosis, but I caution all doctors to err on the side of caution here. After all, most of your patients with chronic loss of the cervical lordosis have had their problems for years. It makes no sense to try to hurry the process and, in fact, may be very counterproductive, possibly even dangerous, to do so.

A brief word of caution is appropriate here. Full extension of the head and neck may be contraindicated in certain individuals. Examples of conditions which might increase the risk of complications include, but are not limited to, history of STROKE or cerebrovascular accident, high blood pressure, vertebral/carotid artery disease, diabetes, atheroslerosis, disc protrusion/prolapse, Down’s syndrome, spinal stenosis, spinal fracture or instability, malignancy and/or infection of the cord or column, and advanced osteoporosis. Other symptoms which would contraindicate further use of extension traction methods, particularly if produced or lateralization of pain into the extremities, numbness, paresthesia, muscular weakness, loss of coordination or function, ataxia, visual disturbances, or any other neurological symptoms.
We have developed a suggested protocol to help screen for individuals who may be at higher risk for complications. Although no screening procedure can guarantee safety for any particular individual, it is important we do everything in our power to minimize risk to our patients. I strongly recommend all patients be thoroughly screened prior to treatment. Extension traction procedures have demonstrated a remarkable record of safety for over two decades now. Let’s keep it that way.
Next month I’ll discuss alternatives for patients who simply can’t handle extension-compression traction.
Dr. Mark R. Payne is the president of Matlin Mfg., a manufacturer and distributor of postural rehab products since 1988. To download a full and unabridged version of this article, link to www.MatlinMfg.com. In the meantime, interested doctors should call for a free copy of screening protocol we use in our office. Please call us at 1-334-448-1210 to request your free copy.
|
|
Rehabilitation
|
|
Written by Dr. Mark R. Payne, D.C.
|
|
Friday, 28 March 2008 15:13 |
|
Last issue, i documented the ineffectiveness of traditional adjustments to substantially change spinal structure. I would like to explain one key reason why adjustments, typically, produce very little structural change. Once you understand how the laws of physics sabotage your adjustments, you’ll be well on your way to making the best corrections of your career.
The problem with physics is that personal opinions don’t matter. It doesn’t matter what they taught us in school, what our practice manager said, or what we happen to believe. Want to know why your adjustments can’t change spinal structure consistently? The answer is painfully obvious when you consider the basic mechanical characteristics of the spine. Most of us had some exposure to basic physical principles in our pre-chiropractic education. Apparently, someone just forgot to tell us how to actually apply them.

The spine is a bony column within an ocean of soft tissue. Posture may be adversely impacted due to injury/deconditioning of the column, the surrounding tissues, or other structures along the kinetic chain. Once injured, the body may adapt and compensate in numerous ways. Surrounding muscles may weaken or become tight/overactive. Supporting ligaments, tendons, and fascia may be overstretched or chronically shortened. Discs degenerate under abnormal loading. Patients compensate for pain or weakness by developing new, often less efficient, ways to move. The nervous system learns new motor habits. The brain slowly adapts to a new perception of what is normal. As you already know, most of this happens so gradually that the patient often has little or no awareness of how off balance and weakened they have become.
Into this complicated collision of cause and effect, action and reaction, steps the bright eyed, bushy-tailed, and hopelessly optimistic young doctor. Armed with only an adjustment, you wade into battle against the effects of time. Undeterred, you find the most dysfunctional joint(s) and give it your best shot. The adjustment is delivered in a fraction of a second. The timing is perfect. The spine yields. The segment moves. The joint cavitates. It’s all so reassuring. It feels so real. But, it’s what you don’t feel that is more important. Because, by the time your hand leaves the spine, the elastic properties of the surrounding soft tissues rebound the spine right back to its original position.

You probably recall terms like "elasticity," "viscosity," and "plasticity" from your high school physics class. Elasticity is pretty self explanatory. It’s the tendency of matter, in this case the paraspinal tissues, to snap back once the force of your adjustment is removed. Think of a rubber band. It responds instantly to stretching forces but the change is only temporary. Viscosity describes the tendency of some thick liquid substances to slowly "flow" and remodel over time. Think of thick motor oil or, if you’re from the South, that last drop of molasses which always seems to find its way out of your biscuit onto your lap. Viscous materials move slowly over time with almost no force required. And, unlike elastic materials, the change is permanent. Finally, plasticity describes the nature of semi-solid substances to also permanently remodel, once the applied force exceeds a certain "yielding point." A good example of a highly plastic material is a block of modeling clay which yields to the force of the sculptor and then permanently retains the new shape.
As it turns out, all living tissues possess some combination of these three properties. Bone, for example, isn’t particularly elastic. Some ligaments have high elastin content and are, therefore (duh!), very "elastic". Tissues with higher water content tend to be more viscous, since water is a highly viscous material. Discs have less elastin and water and are, therefore, more plastic in nature. Taken as a whole, the large ligaments, muscles, and tendons surrounding the spine tend to be mostly viscous and elastic (viscoelastic). As we’ve seen, the more elastic components are resistant to permanent change. But, what if we could address the viscous and, to a lesser extent, plastic elements?

As it turns out, the only way to effectively stretch the surrounding tissues is to apply continuous force over time. Time, the very thing we need most, is the one thing our rapid adjustments can’t provide. To stretch the tissues, we’ll need to apply sustained corrective forces continuously for 20-30 minutes daily. That’s going to require a few basic tools, unless you want to manually hold that stretch on every patient. Life’s way too short for that!
Dr. Mark Payne is the president of Matlin Mfg., a manufacturer and distributor of postural rehab products since 1988. To download a full and unabridged version of this article, link to www.MatlinMfg.com. Interested doctors may contact our office for my FREE REPORT, Suggested Screening Procedures for Patient Safety.
If you are interested in learning more on the subject, call our office. I’ll be glad to share how you can improve your corrective care outcomes by 200-300 percent over adjusting alone without changing your technique or spending a fortune. Contact us at 1-334-448-1210 for your Free Report on patient safety.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Page 9 of 21 |
|
|
|