|
Radiology
|
|
Radiology
|
|
Written by Terry R. Yochum, D.C., D.A.C.B.R., Fellow, A.C.C.R. Alicia M. Yochum, D.C., R.N., B.S.N.
|
|
Tuesday, 01 May 2012 17:23 |
[Case History]
This patient presents following severe trauma to the pelvic region after a motorcycle accident.
Diagnosis: This patient has bilateral fractures of the superior and inferior pubic rami which has been referred to as a STRADDLE FRACTURE. Fortunately, this patient had no injury to the bladder, as bladder trauma is often present with fractures such as this. Of incidental notation is a bilateral transitional segment at the lumbosacral junction with a unilateral accessory joint articulation.
Straddle Fractures
The straddle fracture or comminuted fracture of the pubic arches is the most common type of unstable fracture of the pelvis. This double vertical fracture involves both superior pubic rami and ischiopubic junctions bilaterally. The central fracture fragment is usually displaced posterosuperiorly, placing pressure upon the ventral surface of the bladder. Twenty percent of these patients have bladder rupture and urethral tear which may require diagnosis via urethrography and cystography.1
Bucket-Handle Fracture
The bucket-handle fracture represents a fracture through the superior pubic ramus and ischiopubic junction on the side opposite the oblique force of impact to the pelvis. A fracture or dislocation of the sacroiliac joint on the side of impact is part of the injury. This fracture is usually the result of an automobile or auto/pedestrian accident. The pubic component of the fracture is usually displaced inward and superiorly. Associated injuries to the abdominal viscera, head and thorax may be present.1
Avulsion Fractures
Symphysis Pubis. Severe injuries of the major adductor muscles cause a tearing of bone from the superior or inferior pubic rami near the pubic articulation. This injury is common in soccer players.
Ischial Tuberosity (Rider’s Bone). This type of fracture represents an avulsion of the secondary growth center (apophysis) for the ischial tuberosity as a result of a forceful contraction of the hamstring group of muscles. With healing, an unexplained overgrowth of the avulsed apophysis occurs, often leaving a wide radiolucent gap between the avulsed fragment and the parent ischium.
This overgrowth may be the effect of hyperemia upon the ischial apophysis. Occasionally, the avulsed ischial apophysis may assume a size larger than the parent ischium. This large overgrowth should not be confused with an extraosseous neoplasm. Usually, the patient’s history of a previous severe hamstring injury and the fact that the lesion is asymptomatic secures the proper diagnosis.
These fractures are seen most commonly in cheerleaders and hurdlers. The residual bony fragment has been called “rider’s bone,” because a high percentage of these lesions occur in horseback riders as a result of chronic stress.
Dr. Terry R. Yochum is a second generation chiropractor and a Cum Laude Graduate of National College of Chiropractic, where he subsequently completed his radiology residency. He is currently Director of the Rocky Mountain Chiropractic Radiological Center in Denver, Colorado, and Adjunct Professor of Radiology at the Southern California University of Health Sciences, as well as an instructor of skeletal radiology at the University of Colorado School of Medicine, Denver, CO. Dr. Yochum can be reached at 1-303-940-9400 or by e-mail at
This e-mail address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it
Reference: 1.Yochum TR, Rowe LJ: Essentials of Skeletal Radiology, 3rd ed., Williams & Wilkins, Baltimore, Maryland, 2005.
|
|
|
Radiology
|
|
Written by Andrew Cheesman
|
|
Friday, 16 March 2012 18:49 |
S o, you are considering “transforming” your practice? Or maybe starting a brand new or satellite office? What are some of the things you should keep in mind in making decisions on just what your practice will offer? What should it look like? What kind of vibe would you like it to put out? And how does the decision of installing digital x-ray (DXR) affect your practice?
As they say, there are “many ways to skin a cat.” Each practice is a reflection of its doctor; there is no one right way to operate a practice. That being said, generally speaking, most “successful” practices today should seek to:
Appear modern, cutting edge, and up-to-speed with other health care practices. Patients are turned off when walking into a practice that appears to be circa 1975. They simply don’t feel comfortable with a “tired” atmosphere, complete with old adjustment tables with torn padding.
- Offer technology that provides convenience to the patient, in terms of comfort, functionality and time savings. As “Larry the Cable Guy” would say, “Git er done.” More than ever before, people are busy and don’t have the luxury of taking an inordinate amount of time for an office visit. If an appointment takes too long, they will stop coming, period.
- Give a patient confidence that the technology employed is state-of-the-art. No one wants to be treated by any health care professional if they think there are better protocols and/or technologies that could be utilized. Is your patient education a VCR tape on an old, low resolution TV? That probably won’t cut it.
- Take advice and follow models of other successful practices. Once the wheel was invented, you could pretty much assume that the wheel was a great idea and should be utilized. If you see a true (with the same type of practice in the same type of neighborhood) peer of yours successfully implementing a new technology or protocol, you don’t need to be a “doubting Thomas” – you can jump-start your own advancement by learning from the successful model of others.
How does this apply to DXR?
As you are making decisions regarding your new or “re-invented” office, you would be well-advised to consider whether incorporating DXR is a quality fit for you and your practice. And I will say that DXR is not a fit for every doctor, so I am in no way asserting that DXR is a no-brainer for all chiropractors, because it simply isn’t. However, for those practices that fit the profile, DXR offers great benefits to not only the doctor, but to the patient as well.
Mr. Green Jeans
Obviously, we live in a world that is increasingly focused on being “green” and that trend is only going to intensify as time passes. Young people are more aware of acting in a planet-friendly manner, more so than baby boomers, etc. so “being green” is not a fad that will ever disappear. It is not a “pet rock,” so to speak, but a lasting trend that will be ever-increasing. (If you aren’t old enough to understand the “pet rock” analogy, my apologies.)
An office utilizing flat-screen monitors and the like generally will give the impression of a more cutting-edge practice.
One of the features that DXR contributes is the fact that it eliminates the toxic odor of chemicals present when you are using a film x-ray unit. People are more sensitive than ever to things like a chemical odor and going digital completely eliminates that negative presence.
Less radiation exposure for everyone
Using DXR reduces the exposure to harmful radiation, which the public is more aware of than ever. With cancer on virtually everyone’s minds, the patients are generally very leery of exposure to radiation and will appreciate having digital technology as opposed to exposure to traditional x-rays.
Time is money
Not only does going with DXR save time for the doctor, but it also saves the patient’s time as well, and they will appreciate that. You get your images instantly, as opposed to waiting for film to develop, or, of course, sending the x-rays off to another party. Also, if you need a re-take, you also know that immediately and without additional costs, as you are not using film or chemicals in the first place. Additional x-rays cost virtually nothing. You can take them until you get what you need, in terms of images that display the needed elements.
Additionally, if your patient wants a copy of the x-ray, you can easily hand him a computer disk or email the image, while you have your copy of the image forever. When using film, you typically have only one copy, so you can’t give out a copy to your patient without risking your own image.
Patient education, compliance and retention
Giving your patient an image of their spine helps with patient education, compliance and retention – all at no additional cost with each image you hand out. This allows the patient to more fully understand, and retain, the reality of their condition. And a better educated patient is a more likely retained patient.
Expert analysis on-hand
You will have to check with each individual DXR vendor, but some offer a radiologist on-hand to help analyze images, which you can easily email. When in doubt, the guidance of a radiologist to interpret digital images can be invaluable, and, in some cases, costs you no additional charges. When in doubt, check with your radiologist, at no additional expense.
Developing a high-end image
In practice, you are not only competing with other chiropractors, but you are also being compared to all other health care practices in general. We know that MDs, etc. generally have offices that reflect an upper-scale, high-end image. If patients visit a chiropractor and the office is full of antiquated technologies – including a film-based x-ray unit, it will cause the patients to conjure a poor image of the practice. An office utilizing flat-screen monitors and the like generally will give the impression of a more cutting-edge practice. Yes, it is true that chiropractors encourage an image of being non-surgical and have an aversion to using drugs — unless absolutely necessary – but the two are not mutually exclusive. In other words, you still want a practice that appears somewhat sleek and modern while not advocating allopathic medicine in general.
Extra room to roam
Eliminating your film-based x-ray equipment will allow for additional space in your office. Most doctors of chiropractic struggle to make do with the square footage of their office space; there is a fine line between paying for space and having enough room for not only a waiting room, treatment rooms, etc., but also some space for retail products such as pillows, topicals, in-home rehab, etc. When you convert to DXR, you free up space otherwise used for storing images, film, chemicals and the like. Most chiropractic offices need every square inch they can find and going DXR gives you that little bit of extra space that might make a difference. Andrew Cheesman is Sr. VP Marketing and Sales for RF System Lab North America, based in Lincoln, Nebraska. Their head office is based in Nagano, Japan. They have over 2,000 users in the US and several thousands worldwide. They are now the largest digital retrofit company in the world. You can reach them at 800-905-1554 or visit www.rfamerica.com or email
This e-mail address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it
.
|
|
Radiology
|
|
Written by Terry R. Yochum, D.C., D.A.C.B.R., Fellow, A.C.C.R. Alicia M. Yochum, D.C., R.N., B.S.N.
|
|
Wednesday, 29 February 2012 16:30 |
|
[Case History]
This young adult was in a car accident and has suboccipital pain. Do you see a fracture?
Agenesis of the Atlas Posterior Arch
Synonyms. Aplasia or congenital absence of the posterior arch.
Description. Lack of ossification of the posterior arch of the atlas may be complete and bilateral, may be purely unilateral, or may manifest as small clefts (i.e., spina bifida). Dense fibrous connective tissue remains at the site devoid of ossification. Ossification of the posterior arch of the atlas is normally present at birth, with union visible by 6 years of age.
Clinical Features. Pain or neurological complications are rare. Atlantoaxial instability has been described. There is occasional association with C2-C4 block vertebrae and Klippel-Feil syndrome. Spinal stenosis may also occur. Absence of the posterior arch needs to be differentiated from occipitalization, osteolytic metastases, aneurysmal bone cyst and osteoblastoma. Differentiation from fractures, aggressive bone destruction, and occipitalization must be made with confidence, which may require CT or even MRI investigations.
Radiologic Features. The lateral view is the best projection for identifying the various forms of aplasia. Oblique views are also of assistance in determining unilateral aplasias and clefts. Thin-section CT is the technique of choice for determining the extent of aplasia and providing accurate differential diagnosis. MRI is indicated if a neurological deficit is present.
Bilateral Posterior Arch Agenesis. The characteristic triad of findings with bilateral posterior arch agenesis is absence of the atlas posterior arch, union of the posterior tubercle to the axis spinous process (axis megaspinous sign), and compensatory enlargement and sclerosis of the anterior arch. Occasionally the posterior tubercle will remain visible in normal position (Keller type aplasia). Hypertrophy of the posterior atlantoaxial ligaments may produce spinal canal stenosis and be a factor for cord injury after trauma.
Unilateral Posterior Arch Agenesis (Hemi-Atlas). With unilateral posterior arch agenesis, absence of half of the posterior arch is uncommon. The condition is best determined on the AP open mouth view and CT.
Isolated Clefts of the Posterior Arch. Isolated clefts of the posterior arch are most common in the midline posteriorly (posterior rachischisis, spina bifida occulta), accounting for 97% of arch clefts, with only 3% occurring elsewhere. The second most common site is at the junction zone of the posterior arch with the lateral mass, where the vertebral artery passes over the arch (vertebral artery sulcus cleft). These clefts range in size from 1 to 5 mm; have smooth, corticated opposing margins; and are best seen on oblique and slightly off-lateral projections.
Hypoplasia of the Posterior Arch. Two forms of hypoplasia of the posterior arch are described: thin and short.
- Thin posterior arch. The width of the posterior arch is thin and attenuated maximally at the vertebral artery sulcus. An association with Turner’s syndrome and gonadal dysgenesis has been suggested. It may be a factor for fracture at this site after trauma.
- Short posterior arch. The atlas posterior arch is thick and bulky, and the diameter of the spinal canal is diminished. A described tandem finding is a thick, bulky dens that may contribute to symptomatic spinal stenosis. The incidence of symptoms increases with age or may be triggered by minor trauma. An association with patients of Asian origin has been implicated.
Dr. Terry R. Yochum is a second generation chiropractor and a Cum Laude Graduate of National College of Chiropractic, where he subsequently completed his radiology residency. He is currently Director of the Rocky Mountain Chiropractic Radiological Center in Denver, Colorado, and Adjunct Professor of Radiology at the Southern California University of Health Sciences, as well as an instructor of skeletal radiology at the University of Colorado School of Medicine, Denver, CO. Dr. Yochum can be reached at 1-303-940-9400 or by e-mail at
This e-mail address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it
Dr. Alicia M. Yochum is a third generation chiropractor and 2011 Suma Cum Laude Graduate of Logan College of Chiropractic, as well as a Registered Nurse. She is starting her Radiology Residency at Logan College in April 2012. She can be reached at
This e-mail address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it
.
Reference: 1. Yochum, T.R., & Rowe, L.J. (2005). Essentials of Skeletal Radiology, 3rd ed. Baltimore, MD: Williams & Wilkins.
|
|
|
Radiology
|
|
Written by Terry R. Yochum, D.C., D.A.C.B.R., Fellow, A.C.C.R., Chad J. Maola, D.C. and Alicia M. Yochum, RN, BSN, Senior Intern at Logan College of Chiropractic
|
|
Sunday, 25 September 2011 23:03 |
|
CASE HISTORY
This young male patient fell off a horse and landed on his buttocks.
SACRAL FRACTURES
Sacral fractures usually occur as the result of a fall upon the buttocks, direct trauma or in association with pelvic fractures. Isolated fractures of the sacrum are uncommon and a diligent search for an associated fracture of the pelvic ring or symphysis pubis is often beneficial (as seen in this case). Two types are horizontal and vertical.
Horizontal (transverse) Fractures.
These are the most common types of sacral fractures. The most common location is at the level of the third and fourth sacral tubercle, which is near the lower end of the sacroiliac joints. The fracture line is frequently difficult to identify due to overlying intestinal contents, which may require reexamination or enema. Careful identification of the cortex outlining each sacral foramen (“foraminal lines”) should be scrutinized for disruption or distortion. The lateral radiograph occasionally demonstrates the fracture with disruption of the anterior cortex. Often, the lower segment of the sacrum may be displaced or angled forward. (1)
A horizontal fracture of the upper sacrum, affecting the first or second sacral segments, may occur from high falls such as attempts at suicide (“suicidal jumpers” fracture). (1)
Vertical Fractures.
These usually occur as a result of indirect trauma to the pelvis with more than 50% suffering pelvic organ damage. They are visible on the frontal radiograph, but not the lateral view. The cephalic tilt up view and/or CT may be necessary in order to demonstrate the vertical fracture line, which usually runs nearly the entire length of the sacrum. The normally symmetrical transverse sacral foraminal lines should be carefully scrutinized for detection of the fracture line.
Coccygeal Fractures
Most fractures of the coccyx are transversely oriented, similar to those of the sacrum. Seldom are they seen on the frontal radiograph; the lateral film best demonstrates this type of fracture. The fracture line is usually oblique in presentation, and slight anterior displacement of the distal coccyx is quite common. Developmental variation in the position of the distal coccygeal segment may provide some concern to the inexperienced observer.
Dr. Terry R. Yochum is a second generation chiropractor and a Cum Laude Graduate of National College of Chiropractic, where he subsequently completed his radiology residency. He is currently Director of the Rocky Mountain Chiropractic Radiological Center in Denver, CO, and Adjunct Professor of Radiology at the Southern California University of Health Sciences, as well as an instructor of skeletal radiology at the University of Colorado School of Medicine, Denver, CO. Dr. Yochum can be reached at 1-303-940-9400 or by e-mail at
This e-mail address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it
.
Dr. Chad Maola is a 1990 Magna Cum Laude Graduate of National College of Chiropractic. Dr. Maola is available for post-graduate seminars. He may be reached at 1-727-433-0153 or by email at
This e-mail address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it
.
REFERENCES
1. Yochum TR, Rowe LJ: Essentials of Skeletal Radiology, 3rd ed., Williams & Wilkins, Baltimore, Maryland, 2005.
|
|
Radiology
|
|
Written by Terry R. Yochum, D.C., D.A.C.B.R., Fellow, A.C.C.R., and Tim Maggs, D.C.
|
|
Tuesday, 23 August 2011 23:27 |
|
W e all are victims, in many ways, of the existing healthcare crisis. The auto industry is addressing their crisis through new laws for improved mileage per gallon and stricter pollution controls. The energy crisis continues to search for more efficient and alternative means to produce renewable energy. The healthcare crisis, unlike the above two, is merely shifting responsibilities with regard to who will pay for it. This “system” will continue until it can no longer sustain itself.
Chiropractic’s Role
As chiropractors, we are interested in the neuro-musculo-skeletal system (NMS). The current healthcare system has 3 major flaws in addressing NMS disorders: 1) We wait until someone breaks, 2) we only look at the sight of the break, and 3) our goal is only to remove the pain or symptoms. This approach costs exponentially more, as we all know it is less expensive to “pay now” vs. “pay later,” especially when the proactive approach will produce slower aging, delayed degeneration and a much greater quality of life. Joint replacement surgery is a growth industry. It doubled between 2000 and 2006. Osteoarthritis, the leading arthritis, better known as the wear and tear arthritis, is predicted to have costs and numbers rise by 40% by 2030.
As chiropractors, we know that a joint that has lost mobility is predisposed to a more rapid degeneration. We know that joints will fixate when under greater stress (abnormal mechanical loading), such as with traumas or biomechanical imbalances. These fixations prevent people from moving or exercising, which is the breeding ground for obesity, elevated blood pressure, increased anxieties, elevated cholesterol and much more. We know that we, as a profession, are the most equipped to both detect and improve biomechanical fixations and imbalances. This approach will make a dramatic impact on the “fixing” of this healthcare crisis.
Altered Biomechanics and Bone Marrow Edema?
According to an article published in the journal Radiology 1996 by Mark E. Schweitzer, M.D., and Lawrence M. White, M.D., from Thomas Jefferson University Hospital in Philadelphia, PA, a very unique study was performed to evaluate the effects of altered biomechanical stress on the human skeleton. The details of this study are as follows:
» Twelve asymptomatic volunteers (6 women and 6 men) ranging between the ages of 19 and 41 were chosen to be evaluated in this biomechanical study. All 12 of these asymptomatic volunteers had MR images of their hips, knees, ankles and feet performed at the initial time of commencement of the study. No evidence of pathology or bone marrow edema was seen affecting any of these 12 volunteers and the MR imaging was done bilaterally. Three sets of images were obtained before, baseline and 2 weeks after altered weight bearing and then 3 volunteers two weeks after removal of a pad, which had forced the patient into altered biomechanical weight bearing. The alteration in weight bearing was accomplished by placing an extra large 9/16” (1.4 cm) longitudinal metatarsal arch pad underneath the lateral aspect of one foot to increase pronation. This orthotic was placed in the shoe, but the volunteers did not undergo casting with the foot in this position. Therefore, movement was altered somewhat voluntarily. The volunteers were instructed not to alter their daily or recreational activities in any way other than that caused by the pronation. The volunteers were given an adequate number of pads for all pairs of their shoes. The pads were placed unilaterally to minimize discomfort.1
We know that joints will fixate when under greater stress (abnormal mechanical loading), such as with traumas or biomechanical imbalances.
» After 2 weeks of altered weight bearing, MR images of both the lower extremities were obtained in the STIR (short tau inversion recovery) or fluid sensitive or fat suppression images) imaging sequence. All three sets were done with STIR sequences.1
» The results of these MR images was that 11 of the 12 volunteers demonstrated bone marrow edema on the over pronated side in 10 of the volunteers. One of the volunteers with medial involvement had the findings only on the non over pronated side. These changes were seen most frequently in the foot, four metatarsals and calcaneus. Changes were predominately lateral in 6 volunteers. The tibia was affected in 3 volunteers, two proximally and one distally and in an additional 3 volunteers, the femur was involved, one affecting the proximal femur and two affecting the distal femur. Eleven of these 12 volunteers had pain directly over the areas where bone marrow edema was identified. At MR follow-up, after the pad was removed in two of the three volunteers, the MR images returned completely to normal but, in the third volunteer, MR images demonstrated minimal persistent edema with approximately 50% having been resolved. All of the volunteers were completely asymptomatic immediately after the pad removal and at clinical follow-up. (1 week, 1 month, 1 year)1
Bone is dynamic, undergoing hypertrophy in response to stress. Alternatively, after immobilization from casting or paralysis or in a gravity free environment, bone atrophy occurs. What was most interesting about this study is that bone marrow edema and symptoms directly over the area of edema were created with only 2 weeks of altered biomechanical weight bearing with over pronation of one foot. One wonders if there would be altered biomechanics (subluxation) of the lower extremity and/or the lumbar spine for an extended period of time, what kind of stress this would place on the human skeleton and what long-standing effects it could have on premature degenerative changes within the freely moveable joints of the spine and/or pelvis and lower extremities. The results of this study clearly shows that increased signal intensity on fluid sensitive images or STIR images (fat suppression images) can occur and may represent a bone contusion or bone bruise. The results of this study indicates that the increased signal intensity is the result of a bony response to the stress created upon it without actual fracture occurring. On the basis of Schweitzer’s study, I believe that the altered biomechanics should be added to the list of causes of increased intramedullary signal intensity on T2 and/or STIR weighted images.1,2
It is of interest to note that I (Dr. Yochum) personally interviewed Dr. Mark Schweitzer and asked him if any of these 12 volunteers had lower back pain and/or sacroiliac pain. He told me that those questions were never asked of these volunteers. From my chiropractic perspective, I would have to believe that a large number of these patients would have had sacroiliac and/or lower lumbar pain. It would have been interesting to perform pre and post MRI images of the bones adjacent to the sacroiliac joint and/or the lumbar facets to determine whether bone marrow edema could have been identified there as a result of the altered biomechanical stress from the disturbance of the lower kinetic chain.1,2
Imaging Bone Marrow Edema
Imaging stress to the human skeleton may be done by means of plain films, bone scan, CT or MRI scan. The most sensitive imaging modality to detect stress to the human skeleton reflected as bone marrow edema is magnetic resonance imaging. While bone scans can certainly reflect an increase in turnover of bone, they are not as sensitive as the 1% sensitivity of marrow change occurring with MRI scans. Understanding this concept becomes extremely important to evaluate the highly motivated athlete who may or may not have the presence of a spondylolysis and/or spondylolisthesis on plain film radiographs and may only be seen by means of magnetic resonance imaging scans. It is possible that a patient may have normal plain film radiographs, but yet have pain on extension and have, in fact, the early fatigue fracture (stress fracture) of spondylolysis and be hidden or “PENDING.” Since the plain film radiographs may not be sensitive enough to detect the “PENDING” spondylolysis or certainly not see edema adjacent to existing pars defects (spondylolysis), specialized physiologic imaging such as magnetic resonance imaging should be given clinical consideration.2
Since on standard MR imaging with standard T1- and T2-weighted images, it is quite possible that bone marrow edema may be missed on the T2-weighted image in a patient who may be “PENDING” without defect or in a patient with an existing pars defect, who may have bone marrow edema adjacent to the pars defect. With that being the case, it is important that an additional imaging series referred to a short tau inversion recovery (STIR) images, otherwise known as fluid sensitive images or fat suppression images, should be performed routinely in patients where there is a high suspicion of the possibility of a hidden or pending pars defect or bone marrow edema adjacent to an existing pars defect. The imaging sequence of choice, which should be added to the standard routine MRI scan, is a sagittal STIR imaging sequence, which will unequivocally rule in or out the possibility of bone marrow edema in the region of the pars interarticulares, with or without a defect.2
For further discussion in patient management and evaluation of the problematic cases of spondylolysis and/or spondylolisthesis in the lower lumbar spine and how it relates to the highly motivated athlete, please see chapter 5 of Dr. Yochum’s textbook, “Essentials of Skeletal Radiology” which is the 3rd edition published in 2005.2
Evidence Based
The industry is pushing for all care to be evidence based. The irony is that under this heading, less imaging is encouraged. Less treatment is encouraged. And, in the end, less correction will have been done. The chiropractic profession would do well to redefine our identity, and associate itself closely with the detection and correction of biomechanical faults, an identity our forefathers fought hard to protect. We would then be the only profession whose goal would be to correct these structural imbalances (even in the absence of symptoms), and not just provide symptomatic care. This identity would enhance the public’s perception of our profession, as the public is begging for someone to help them achieve structural preservation, especially when this approach would improve their long-term quality of life.
In order to achieve this result, we must look at all people from a biomechanical perspective, as everyone has biomechanical faults and imbalances. Just as the orthodontist improves the alignment of the teeth long before problems occur, it’s easy to understand the benefit of doing this to the NMS system as well. As seen in Fig. 1, all people have biomechanical imbalances, and these imbalances always originate in the feet.
If we ignore the imbalances in the feet, we would be ignoring the importance of a balanced foundation. Introductory Architecture teaches the importance of a balanced foundation. This is the very reason our office puts every patient into custom orthotics at the beginning of all correction programs.
Biomechanics of Feet
There are 3 arches in each foot, with each being critically important for providing foundational balance. Upon scanning of the feet (Fig. 2), it is easily detectable if any or all of these arches have fallen. Most patients have multiple fallen arches, when scanned in the standing position. In addition, aging, gravity and stress over time will encourage further falling of these arches, which will alter centers of gravity in each and every joint of the body. Abnormal centers of gravity, combined with aging, will further accelerate the degenerative process in joints.
Custom Orthotics
The simple solution to current foot/structural imbalances as well as future structural weaknesses is to put the patient into flexible custom orthotics at the start of their corrective program. Regardless of whether the patient appears to have pronated, supinated or even normal arches, the digital foot scan will demonstrate that most people will have some degree of fallen arches, as well as imbalances with body weight distribution. Secondly, although we don’t test for this in our office, a significant percentage of people will over-pronate during the gait cycle, and this over-pronation is blocked with flexible custom orthotics. Many injuries, especially sports injuries, occur or are aggravated during this over-pronation phase.
After we digitally scan each patient, along with our explanation of Fig. 1 (Crooked Man), along with the explanation of the potential for acceleration of degeneration if left imbalanced, most people will excitedly agree to the inclusion of custom orthotics as soon as possible. All people have a similar lifetime goal: to have a higher quality of life combined with greater activity.
More patients wearing custom orthotics in your office will convert to improved clinical results, improved patient satisfaction and greater patient compliance. And, if an office can “manage” patients properly, patients will require new orthotics every two years, keeping more people engaged in active care. This truly is the beginning of making your practice more successful and fixing the healthcare crisis.
Dr. Terry R. Yochum is a second generation chiropractor and a Cum Laude Graduate of National College of Chiropractic, where he subsequently completed his radiology residency. He is currently Director of the Rocky Mountain Chiropractic Radiological Center in Denver, CO, and Adjunct Professor of Radiology at the Southern California University of Health Sciences, as well as an instructor of skeletal radiology at the University of Colorado School of Medicine, Denver, CO. Dr. Yochum can be reached at 1-303-940-9400 or by e-mail at
This e-mail address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it
.
Dr. Maggs currently practices full time, while also lecturing for Foot Levelers. He is the developer of The Structural Management® Program, as well as the 10 Week Webinar Series, "How to Build Your High School Athlete Practice." He can be reached at 1-518-393-6566 or
This e-mail address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it
. His website is www.StructuralManagement.com.
References:
1. Schweitzer, Mark E; White, Lawrence M., Radiology; 198:851-853, 1996.
2. Yochum, TR, Rowe LJ: Essentials of Skeletal Radiology, ed. 3, 2005, Chapter 5.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Page 2 of 13 |
|
|
|