Radiology


Osteitis Pubis
User Rating: / 1
PoorBest 
Radiology
Written by Dr. Terry R. Yochum, D.C.; D.A.C.B.R.; Fellow, A.C.C.R. and Dr. Chad J. Maola, D.C.   
Friday, 01 December 2006 10:16

HISTORY:

Both of these female patients are complaining of focal pain at the pubic articulation. One of them developed this pain after a difficult delivery of a child and the other patient after surgery for a retroverted uterus.

 


Figures 1 & 2. Characteristic changes are visible at the pubic symphysis with subchondral sclerosis, articular erosions, small osteophyte formation and a slight offset of the pubic bones. This radiographic appearance is characteristic of osteitis pubis.

Discussion:
Osteitis pubis is a painful condition of the pubic symphysis articulation characterized by bony resorption and spontaneous reossification. Although the pathogenesis is uncertain, the most common related antecedent event is surgery within close proximity to the symphysis.1

Clinical Features
Onset of signs and symptoms is usually within one to three months after surgery in the locality of the symphysis pubis articulation. The frequency of this postsurgical complication is between 1 percent and 3 percent. The most common types of surgery are for the prostate, bladder, urethra, uterus and cervix. Statistically, prostate surgery is the most commonly associated surgical procedure. Additional causes include pregnancy, trauma, and, often, unknown factors.1

Symptomology may be localized or referred and is usually described as groin burning.2 Pain is often excruciating on direct palpation. Exercise or activities involving thigh adduction, trunk flexion or even walking may refer pain to the perineal, testicular, suprapubic or inguinal area. In addition, an audible click in the area of the pubic symphysis may be heard during these activities. Postejaculatory pain referral to the scrotum and perineum has been noted in males. The symptoms are generally relieved by rest. Redness or heat is usually not present. The gait is antalgic, with trunk flexion and waddling to prevent symphyseal stress.

Pain typically subsides over an indefinite period up to one or two years, but may require arthrodesis.1,3 With persistent pain and biomechanical alterations in gait, early sacroiliac degenerative changes could ensue.2
Radiologic Features

There is a radiographic latent period after the onset of symptoms of one to three weeks; however, some patients will never manifest definitive radiologic changes. When present, the findings may simulate joint infection.1,2

The most characteristic radiographic appearance is a bilateral and usually symmetric involvement of the pubic bone and adjacent rami. Irregularity of the joint margin, subchondral sclerosis, and a moth-eaten type of osteoporosis, with widening of the joint space can be striking. 3 With resolution, there is reconstitution of normal bone density, but the joint margin frequently remains irregular and may even be ankylosed.1


References
1. Yochum TR, Rowe LJ: Essentials of Skeletal Radiology, 3rd ed., Williams & Wilkins, Baltimore, Maryland, 2005.
2. Cibert J: Post-Operative Osteitis Pubis Cause and Treatment, Br. J. Urol, 24:213, 1952.
3. Pauli S, et al., Osteomyelitis Pubis Versus Osteitis Pubis, Br. J. Sports Med. (1):71, 2002


Dr. Terry R. Yochum is a second generation chiropractor and a Cum Laude Graduate of National College of Chiropractic, where he subsequently completed his radiology residency. He is currently Director of the Rocky Mountain Chiropractic Radiological Center in Denver, Colorado, and Adjunct Professor of Radiology at the Southern California University of Health Sciences, as well as an instructor of skeletal radiology at the University of Colorado School of Medicine, Denver, CO. Dr. Yochum can be reached at 303-940-9400 or by e-mail at This e-mail address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it .

Dr. Chad J. Maola is a 1990 Magna Cum Laude Graduate of National College of Chiropractic. Dr. Maola is a Chiropractic Orthopedist and is available for post-graduate seminars. He may be reached at 303-690-8503 or e-mail This e-mail address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it .

 
Vacuum Phenomenon
User Rating: / 2
PoorBest 
Radiology
Written by Dr. Terry R. Yochum, D.C.; D.A.C.B.R.; Fellow, A.C.C.R. and Dr. Chad J. Maola, D.C.   
Tuesday, 14 November 2006 16:16

DISCUSSION
The vacuum sign (of Knuttson) is an important early radiographic finding.1 Essentially, this represents collections of nitrogen gas in nuclear and annular fissures and presents as an area of linear radiolucency in the disc space.2  Studies have shown this to be a common sign of disc aging and degeneration, with an incidence of two to three percent in the general population.2 The collection of nitrogen in the discal fissures is thought to originate from adjacent extracellular fluid. 

In movements of the spine that produce a lowered pressure in the disc, such as in extension, nitrogen is released from the adjacent extracellular fluid and, due to the pressure gradient, accumulates in the discal fissures.  On Magnetic Resonance imaging, the disc shows diminished signal intensity due to dehydration, and a signal void at the vacuum site.  This collection of gas can be made to disappear with spinal flexion and reappear with spinal extension.1,2  Disc infections do not demonstrate this sign, due to fluid collections in the fissures.1,2 Central vacuum phenomena correspond to fissuring of the nucleus pulposus, while peripheral lesions represent rim lesions where the annulus fibrosus has been disrupted from its attachment to the vertebral body margin.2

In the peripheral joints, especially the hip, shoulder, and knee, a vacuum sign does not denote degenerative joint changes.2  This is produced as an accompanying physiologic phenomenon, usually induced by the position of the patient in a position of traction when the exposure was made.  Gas in the symphysis pubis is a normal finding during pregnancy and up to three weeks postpartum and may be seen as a vertical, thin radiolucency.

As the disease process progresses in the disc, the degenerative signs become more severe.  Subluxation phenomena are more readily recognizable, and lateral, anterior, and posterior vertebral body displacements of a measurable degree occur.  Flexion/extension films usually reveal decreased motion in these displaced segments.  Disc height is markedly diminished, with greater than twenty-five percent loss of its vertical dimension.  Loss of disc height can also be due to infection, which should be excluded by careful scrutiny for the loss of the vertebral body endplates.2

Dr. Terry R. Yochum is a second generation chiropractor and a Cum Laude Graduate of National College of Chiropractic, where he subsequently completed his radiology residency.  He is currently Director of the Rocky Mountain Chiropractic Radiological Center in Denver, Colorado, and Adjunct Professor of Radiology at the Southern California University of Health Sciences, as well as an instructor of skeletal radiology at the University of Colorado School of Medicine, Denver, CO. Dr. Yochum can be reached at 303-940-9400 or by e-mail at This e-mail address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it .

Dr. Chad J. Maola is a 1990 Magna Cum Laude Graduate of National College of Chiropractic.  Dr. Maola is a Chiropractic Orthopedist and is available for post-graduate seminars.  He may be reached at 303-690-8503 or e-mail This e-mail address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it .

 
Librarian Overdue for Pelvic Pain Relief
Radiology
Written by Dr. John Danchik, D.C., C.C.S.P., F.I.C.C.   
Tuesday, 17 October 2006 11:44

hipimbalanceHistory and Presenting Symptoms

A 37-year-old female describes a history of occasional pain in her lower back region, most noticeable on the left side.  She states that her low back pain “just seems to come and go,” with no obvious triggering activities.  Her pain is localized to the posterior hip region, and does not extend below the pelvis.  She is a recreational runner who usually enjoys hiking, snowboarding, and occasional soccer games with friends, but she denies any specific injury or trauma to her lower back.  On a 100mm Visual Analog Scale, she rates the pain in her lower back and pelvic region as varying from 30mm to 50mm.  She takes over-the-counter NSAID’s when the pain in her lower back interferes with her daily activities or her job duties as the manager of the local library.

Exam Findings

Vitals.  This active female weighs 162 lbs. which, at 5’10’’, results in a BMI of 23—she is not overweight or obese.  She reports that she works out regularly on the resistance machines at a local exercise center, and runs at least twelve miles each week.  She is a non-smoker, drinks wine moderately, and her blood pressure and pulse rate are within normal ranges (BP: 118/76 mmHg; pulse rate: 64 bpm).

Posture and gait.  Standing postural evaluation finds evidence of a lower iliac crest on the right, but the greater trochanters are level.  The left ilium is rotated forward, with prominence of the left ASIS.  Her knees and ankles are well aligned, but there is obvious medial bowing of both Achilles tendons, with pes planus and hyperpronation bilaterally.  During gait, both feet demonstrate a moderate toe-out.  Inspection of her shoes finds scuffing and wearing at the lateral aspect of both heels.

Chiropractic evaluation.  Motion palpation identifies limitations in segmental motion at the left SI joint, with localized tenderness.  The left SI joint demonstrates loss of end range mobility, and pain is reported during motion testing.  Gaenslen’s and Yeoman’s tests for SI joint dysfunction both cause increased pain when performed on the left side.  Lumbar ranges of motion are within expected norms, and neurologic testing is negative for sensory, motor, and reflexive disorders.

Imaging

A lumbopelvic series (AP and lateral lumbopelvic views) is taken in the upright position during relaxed standing.  The sacral base angle is 38° and the lumbar lordosis measures 46°.  There is no significant discrepancy in femur head or iliac crest heights, and no lateral listing or lateral curvature is noted.

Clinical Impression

Moderate lumbopelvic misalignment, with chronic mechanical dysfunction of the left sacroiliac joint.  Poor biomechanical support is noted in the lower extremities, which exacerbates her lumbopelvic dysfunction syndrome.

Treatment Plan

Adjustments.  Specific chiropractic adjustments for the lumbosacral and sacroiliac joints were provided as needed.  Side-posture adjustments were well-tolerated and resulted in good articular releases.

Support.  She was fitted with custom-made, flexible stabilizing orthotics, based on foot imaging in mid-stance.  The inserts were designed to provide support for her arches and decrease the biomechanical stress on her pelvis and sacroiliac joints during the entire gait cycle.

Rehabilitation.  She was instructed in a daily core strengthening program at home using elastic exercise tubing.  The focus was on activation of her transverse abdominis musculature, for improved spinal-pelvic stability.

Response to Care

This patient responded well to her spinal adjustments, and she adapted very quickly to her orthotics.  She performed her daily home exercise program regularly, and demonstrated good exercise performance at her weekly rehab review sessions.  After eight weeks of adjustments (twelve visits) and daily home exercises, she was released to a self-directed maintenance program.

Discussion

This patient had a chronic pelvic misalignment, which was associated with pronation and biomechanical dysfunction in the lower extremities.  Her chiropractic treatment plan included orthotics to support her strained lower extremities, and specific exercises to improve her core pelvic stability.  She responded well to her adjustments, but also needed support from the orthotics and professional guidance for her corrective exercises.

Dr. John J. Danchik is the seventh inductee to the American Chiropractic Association Sports Hall of Fame.  He is the current chairperson of the United States Olympic Committee’s Chiropractic Selection Program and lectures extensively in the United States and abroad on current trends in sports chiropractic and rehabilitation.  Dr. Danchik is an associate editor of the Journal of the Neuromusculoskeletal System.  He can be reached by e-mail at This e-mail address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it .

 

 
What Practice Structure Suits You Best? Starting a New Practice V
Radiology
Written by Peter Fernandez, DC   
Tuesday, 17 October 2006 11:05

Solo Practitioner (No Incorporation)
This type of practice structure is when a doctor is not incorporated.  In this case, the doctor does not have the personal asset protection advantage that a corporate shield has to offer.  Being non-incorporated, if someone files a malpractice suit against the doctor, they will not only be after all his business assets (equipment, accounts receivables, checking/savings accounts, insurance coverage), they will also be able to easily attach claim to his personal assets (home, furniture, vehicles, savings accounts, checking accounts, stocks, bonds, etc.).

Obviously, practicing solo (unincorporated) is very risky.  The average doctor will have three malpractice cases filed against him during his career.  Are you going to leave all your assets exposed?  I hope not.  There is no sure thing when it comes to lawsuits, but a corporate shield is usually effective in protecting your personal assets from business related claims.  Therefore, incorporating your business is strongly recommended. 

Partnerships
What is your motive for seeking a partner?

The two main reasons people seek a partnership are:

1. Sharing the stress. Starting a new practice on your own is extremely stressful. However, if you choose a partnership, you are setting yourself up for even more stress when the partnership inevitably fails.

2. One doctor wants the use of another doctor’s money. Remember, the person who puts in most money will want—and demand—most of the control.

Do you really want a partner?  Consider the following statistics:

•  70% of partnerships break up within two years.
•  90% of partnerships end in divorce.
•  Partners never share the same passion, work ethics, work  habits, management views, etc.
•  A divorce in business can be just as traumatic and expensive as one in marriage.

The break-up of your partnership will undeniably confirm that entering into a partnership was the most expensive mistake you ever made.  
 
If You Are Determined to Start a Practice with a
Partner, Follow this Rule
Sign a partner separation settlement agreement before you start your practice. You need to be able to end the partnership in a non-threatening manner. Decide, in advance, who gets the account receivables, X-ray equipment, adjusting tables, therapy, who leaves the facility, etc.

Don’t fool yourself into thinking that you don’t need this kind of agreement because you’re going into practice with your best friend.  There is a tremendous amount of truth and warning in the phrase “best friends make the worst enemies.”  If you execute a partner separation settlement agreement in advance, your best friend will probably remain a friend. It’s like having a roll bar on your Jeep. You hope you’ll never need it but, if you do, you’ll be happy it’s there.

Five Reasons Why Partnerships Blow Up
1. One partner wants to build the practice faster, work harder, and practice more hours than the other partner. The other partner works less, but still wants to share the income fifty-fifty. It won’t work.

2. One partner hires a spouse or relative to work in the practice. How can the other partner say, “No.”  This always causes problems.

3. One partner takes cash from the cash drawer; the other partner does not appreciate being “stolen” from.

4. One partner becomes disabled. The other partner covers his practice for six weeks to ninety days. Any longer and the partnership will end in a divorce.

5. One partner wants to gouge insurance companies; the other partner is ethical. The ethical DC will end the partnership.

Advantages of a Partnership
The advantages of a partnership are sharing responsibilities, sharing expenses, and covering for each other.

Disadvantages of a Partnership
A major disadvantage of a partnership is that almost all partners are considered equally liable for the other partner’s mistakes. Depending on the type of partnership, if your partner is sued for malpractice, you will also be sued. If one partner gets a bad reputation with insurance companies, the same brush will paint the other partner. If one partner is over-friendly with patients of the opposite sex, the other partner’s reputation will also be tarnished.  There will also be arguments over money when one doctor is generating more income or contributing more toward the growth of the practice than the other. 

Should you incorporate?
Talk to your accountant—he’s the expert on your particular tax situation. As previously discussed, an advantage of having a corporation is that it usually limits your liability. If a creditor sues your corporation, they can go after the assets of your corporation, but probably will not be able to go after your personal assets. There are also a few possible tax advantages, i.e., you may be able to deduct your health insurance premiums, create a pension plan, buy your automobiles through your corporation, etc. However, it’s usually more expensive to run a corporation than it is to practice solo, and there’s definitely less flexibility of operation.

Three Types of Corporations
1. A Professional Corporation (PC) or Professional Association (PA). These corporations can only be owned by professionals.  Most states that have PC or PA corporations require professionals to use these types of corporations.

2. An incorporation (Inc.) – If it’s legal to practice under an “Inc.” in your state, you may be able to hire MD’s as employees. Non-DC’s may be able to own a portion or all of the corporation.

3. A “Limited Liability” Corporation (LLC). This is a fairly new type of corporation in which your liability is usually limited to the amount of money you have invested in the corporation.  Many attorneys prefer LLC’s because of their liability protection.  However, most accountants don’t recommend LLC’s because of increased accounting expenses.

Again, check with your accountant to determine if you should incorporate and, if so, what type of corporation would best suit your needs.

When you’re through being an associate and are ready to start your own practice, hire a consultant who specializes in starting practices to guide you.  Don’t think that you now have the experience necessary to start and build a new practice…you don’t!  Yes, you’ve gained the experience of caring for patients and learned some good office procedures, but that’s not enough knowledge to start a successful new practice.  You still have to learn how to find a great office location, acquire effective bank negotiating strategies and cost-cutting remodeling negotiations, as well as how to market a new practice, etc.  It’s the lack of this specialized knowledge that dooms new practices, not the lack of knowledge regarding patient care.

Next in this series on “How To Start A Practice,” I’ll discuss whether or not you should start a practice by entering into an independent contract arrangement.

Dr. Peter G. Fernandez is the world’s authority on starting a practice.  He has 30 years’ experience in starting new practices, has written four books and numerous articles on the subject, and has consulted in the opening of over 3,000 new practices.  Please contact Dr. Fernandez at 10733 57th Avenue North, Seminole, Florida 33772; 1-800-882-4476; This e-mail address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it or visit www.drfernandez.com.

 

 
Heavy Metal Poisoning
Radiology
Written by Dr. Terry R. Yochum, D.C.; D.A.C.B.R.; Fellow, A.C.C.R. and Dr. Chad J. Maola, D.C.   
Thursday, 28 September 2006 22:28

DISCUSSION

The major metals involved in producing visible radiologic changes are lead, phosphorus, and bismuth. Of these, lead is the most frequent, but lead intoxication is still a rare skeletal disorder.

Lead may be ingested, inhaled, or implanted. Clinical symptoms occur abruptly, with abdominal pain, encephalopathy, and paralysis. Radiologically, the most definitive signs are the linear, transverse densities at the metaphyses (lead lines). The deposition of lead may also precipitate remodeling abnormalities. Phosphorus and bismuth exhibit similar changes.

Workers involved in the polymerization of polyvinyl chloride (PVC) may develop a peculiar form of acroosteolysis.

Dr. Terry R. Yochum is a second generation chiropractor and a Cum Laude Graduate of National College of Chiropractic, where he subsequently completed his radiology residency. He is currently Director of the Rocky Mountain Chiropractic Radiological Center in Denver, Colorado, and Adjunct Professor of Radiology at the Southern California University of Health Sciences, as well as an instructor of skeletal radiology at the University of Colorado School of Medicine, Denver, CO. Dr. Yochum can be reached at 303-940-9400 or by e-mail at This e-mail address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it .

Dr. Chad J. Maola is a 1990 Magna Cum Laude Graduate of National College of Chiropractic. Dr. Maola is a Chiropractic Orthopedist and is available for post-graduate seminars. He may be reached at 303-690-8503 or e-mail This e-mail address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it .

 

 
«StartPrev12345678910NextEnd»

Page 9 of 13
 

requestmagazinebutton

Recent Comments

 

TAC Publications

The American Chiropractor Magazine: Digital Issues | Past Issues | Buyer's Guide

 

More Information

TAC Editorial: About | Circulation | Contact

Sales: Advertising | Subscriptions | Media Kit